Theranos Saga Just Keeps Getting More Intriguing

CEO Elizabeth Holmes to share data at AACC annual meeting

This is an excerpt from a 400-word article in the May 2 issue of THE DARK REPORT. The complete article is available paid members of the Dark Intelligence Group.

Theranos logoIT’S BEEN AN EVENTFUL COUPLE OF MONTHS for Theranos, the lab testing company that says its goal is disruptive innovation of the clinical laboratory industry. Novelists cannot write fiction as compelling as the unfolding real story about this controversial company.

With The Wall Street Journal continuing to press its investigation of Theranos’ activities, and with various federal agencies scrutinizing and proposing sanctions of the controversial company, there are plenty of new developments for clinical lab stakeholders to follow.

In a letter to Theranos executives, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it is prepared to:

  • revoke the company’s CLIA certificate;
  • impose a fine of $10,000 per day;
  • suspend and cancel the lab’s approval to receive Medicare payments; and
  • impose a two-year ban on the owner, operator, and laboratory director for owning or operating a clinical laboratory.

Pathologists and medical laboratory professionals will recognize that these are among the most severe sanctions that CMS can impose on a laboratory under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Further, clinical pathologists who currently serve as medical directors of CLIA laboratories will find it useful to read the entire letter sent to the company on March 18, as it describes how CMS viewed the responses that Theranos provided following a January 25, 2016, letter from CMS describing deficiencies identified during an inspection of the company’s CLIA lab facility in Newark, California.

The next hammer blow came just five days later. On April 18, the Journal published a story describing how Theranos was the subject of a criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice, and that the Securities and Exchange Commission was looking into the activities of the lab company. Theranos acknowledged that it was aware of these federal probes.

For its part, the company made two significant announcements last month involving membership of its Scientific and Medical Advisory Board. Also, the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) issued a press release stating that founder and CEO Elizabeth Holmes would present scientific data on its diagnostic technology at a plenary session of the AACC’s annual meeting in Philadelphia this August.

Do you plan to attend the AACC meeting this year, and is Holmes’ speech one of your primary reasons? Please share your thoughts on the future for Holmes and Theranos in the comments below.


Click here to read the full article, Theranos in the News, for Better and Worse

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  • garys

    Attending AACC, but NOT to hear more of Elizabeth’s obfuscations regarding innovations in clinical laboratory science.

  • Gwin Filleman

    I have representation from my company attending AACC, but it is definitely NOT to hear Ms. Holmes. However, I am curious about the addition of the 5 past presidents of AACC being new members of it’s Scientific and Medical Advisory Board. That makes me rethink membership in AACC.

  • Elizabeth Rogers

    Yeah – I am also amazed at AACC. They are now having Homes speak AFTER Theranos has been cited by CMS. I think the answers to her technology and patient safety issues have already been revealed by CMS and there is really no need for her to speak. Holmes is now using AACC as a last straw to try and save herself. AACC should be ashamed of themselves to be associated with the company that finally got caught with their fraudulent activities and not abiding by the rules that all clinical labs have had to abide by for years. AACC should be ashamed of themselves.


Leave a Reply

Enter Your Login Credentials
This setting should only be used on your home or work computer.


Send this to a friend