TAG:
Medicare Part B
Medicare Part B medical insurance helps pay for some services and products not covered by Part A (hospital insurance) for Americans aged 65 and older who have worked and paid into the system. It also provides health insurance to younger people with disabilities.
Part B coverage begins once a patient meets his or her deductible ($147 in 2013), then typically Medicare covers 80% of approved services, while the remaining 20% is paid by the patient, either directly or indirectly by private Medigap insurance.
For clinical labs and pathology groups, Part B covers laboratory and diagnostic tests. Laboratory tests include certain blood tests, urinalysis, tests on tissue specimens, and some screening tests. They must be provided by a laboratory that meets Medicare requirements.
Complex rules are used to manage the benefit, and advisories are periodically issued which describe coverage criteria. On the national level these advisories are issued by CMS, and are known as National Coverage Determinations (NCD). Local Coverage Determinations (LCD) apply within the multi-state area managed by a specific regional Medicare Part B contractor, and Local Medical Review Policies (LMRP) were superseded by LCDs in 2003.
Medicare Part B payments make up about 15% of the revenue of the two biggest national lab companies. By contrast, it is common for community labs to have between 30% and 65% of their revenue come from Medicare Part B payments.
Part B coverage can also be provided by private insurers through Medicare Advantage Plans. Enrollment in private Medicare Advantage plans has more than doubled since 2006, according to the New York Times. As these plans gain popularity, clinical labs and pathology groups continue to find themselves without access to patients they once served. Medicare beneficiaries now enrolled in Advantage plans comprise nearly one-third of all Medicare beneficiaries.
Generally speaking, growth in Medicare Advantage enrollment favors the national labs, with private insurers providing them exclusive network contracts. This means less market access to these patients by community labs.
Hospital CEOs Have Nothing to Fear from Theranos
By R. Lewis Dark | From the Volume XXII, Number 16 – November 16, 2015 Issue
FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS, Theranos, the lab testing company that says it intends to disrupt the clinical lab industry, has been the subject of cover sto- ries in many prominent consumer and business publications. Its masterful public relations campaign seems to have touched almost eve…
Might Lawsuits Come Next in Theranos Story?
By Robert Michel | From the Volume XXII, Number 16 – November 16, 2015 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: Recent disclosures in the news indicate that an agreement between Theranos and Safeway has gone sour— after Safeway spent a third of a billion dollars to fulfill its part of the collaboration! Reporting by The Wall Street Journal c…
Will 2016 Bring Opportunity or Tribulations for Labs?
By R. Lewis Dark | From the Volume XXII No. 15 – October 26, 2015 Issue
WE ARE JUST ABOUT EIGHT WEEKS FROM THE ADVENT OF 2016. Given the rapid transformation of healthcare that continues to unfold, it is timely to assess how clinical labs and pathology groups are likely to fare during the coming year. On the plus side, the ongoing evolution toward integration of clinica…
Labs React with Criticism to Proposed ADLT Rule
By Joseph Burns | From the Volume XXII No. 15 – October 26, 2015 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: Some in the lab industry had high hopes that passage of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) last year would favorably resolve a number of important issues. However, those hopes were dashed following the September 25 release by CMS of a proposed rule setting out how i…
Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014: Will price reporting rule drive small labs out of business?
By Mary Van Doren | From the Volume XXII No. 14 – October 5, 2015 Issue
This first assessment of the PAMA (Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014) proposed rule on market reporting of lab prices gives pathologists and lab executives insights about the good, the bad, and the…
Did Some Lab Execs ‘Get What They Wished For?’
By R. Lewis Dark | From the Volume XXII No. 14 – October 5, 2015 Issue
BY NOW, MOST OF YOU HAVE LEARNED that, just 12 days ago, CMS issued the proposed rule that details how it will handle the private market price reporting mandate of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA). Almost immediately, critics spoke out about the obvious inequities that will re…
CMS Releases Draft of PAMA Market Price Rule
By Joseph Burns | From the Volume XXII No. 14 – October 5, 2015 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: CMS’ proposed rule details how it will collect private market data, then use that data to establish prices for the Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule beginning in 2017. The proposed rule will limit data reporting to les…
Labs Have Questions for CMS on Proposed Rule
By Joseph Burns | From the Volume XXII No. 14 – October 5, 2015 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: On September 25, CMS took a long overdue step to issue a proposed rule on how medical laboratories are to report private market prices for lab tests to the Medicare program during 2016. The proposed rule provides insights as to how CMS envisions pricing new tests and advanced…
Will Humana’s Sale to Aetna Hurt Smaller Labs?
By R. Lewis Dark | From the Volume XXII No. 10 – July 13, 2015 Issue
FURTHER CONSOLIDATION AMONG THE NATION’S LARGEST HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES is expected following the news on July 3, that Aetna, Inc., and Humana, Inc., had entered a sales agreement calling for Aetna to pay $37 billion to acquire Humana. Should the proposed sale take place, the consequences are …
Deep-Discount Lab Prices to Haunt All California Labs
By R. Lewis Dark | From the Volume XXII NO. 9 – June 22, 2015 Issue
FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS, THE CLINICAL LAB INDUSTRY been marked by a fundamental schism. On one side of the schism are the public lab companies that have aggressively used deeply-discounted loss-leader pricing practices when negotiating managed care contracts to capture market share. On the other si…
CURRENT ISSUE

Volume XXXII, No. 6 – April 21, 2025
Now that a federal judge has vacated the FDA’s LDT rule, The Dark Report analyzes the judgement and notes the various steps the FDA could take in response. Also, lab testing at pharmacies is proving to be less successful than was once anticipated.
See the full table of contentsHow Much Laboratory Business Intelligence Have You Missed?
Lab leaders rely on THE DARK REPORT for actionable intelligence on important developments in the business of laboratory testing. Maximize the money you make-and the money you keep! Best of all, it is released every three weeks!
Sign up for TDR Insider
Join the Dark Intelligence Group FREE and get TDR Insider FREE!
Never miss a single update on the issues that matter to you and your business.
Topics
- Anatomic Pathology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Clinical Laboratory
- Clinical Laboratory Trends
- Digital Pathology
- Genetic Testing
- In Vitro Diagnostics
- IVD/Lab Informatics
- Lab Intelligence
- Lab Marketplace
- Lab Risk & Compliance
- Laboratory Automation
- Laboratory Billing
- Laboratory Compliance
- Laboratory Equipment
- Laboratory Information Systems
- Laboratory Management
- Lean Six Sigma
- Managed Care Contracts
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Pathology Trends
- People
- Uncategorized