TAG:
CLIA certification
CLIA certification is the requirement under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 that all entities that perform even one test, including waived tests, on … “materials derived from the human body for the purpose of providing information for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or the assessment of the health of, human beings” meet certain Federal requirements. If an entity performs tests for these purposes, it is considered under CLIA to be a laboratory and must register with the CLIA program.
The CLIA certification application collects information about a medical laboratory’s operation, which is necessary to determine the type of certificate to be issued and the fees to be assessed.
All types of CLIA certifications are effective for two years, and the different types of certificates are:
- Certificate of Waiver – Issued to a laboratory that performs only CLIA waived tests
- Certificate for Provider Performed Microscopy (PPM) procedures – Issued to a laboratory in which a physician, midlevel practitioner or dentist performs specific microscopy procedures during the course of a patient’s visit. A limited list of microscopy procedures is included under this certificate type and these are categorized as moderate complexity.
- Certificate of Registration – Issued to a laboratory to allow the laboratory to conduct nonwaived (moderate and/or high complexity) testing until the laboratory is surveyed (inspected) to determine its compliance with the CLIA regulations. Only laboratories applying for a certificate of compliance or a certificate of accreditation will receive a certificate of registration.
- Certificate of Compliance – Issued to a laboratory after an inspection by the state Department of Health that finds the laboratory to be in compliance with all applicable CLIA requirements
- Certificate of Accreditation – Issued to a laboratory on the basis of the laboratory’s accreditation by an accreditation organization approved by CMS. This type of certificate is issued to a laboratory that performs nonwaived (moderate and/or high complexity) testing.
There are six CMS-approved accreditation or organizations:
- AABB
- American Osteopathic Association
- American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics
- COLA
- College of American Pathologists (CAP)
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Laboratories that apply for accreditation by one of the CMS-approved accreditation organizations must also apply to CMS for a COA at the same time. Laboratories must apply for the highest-level CLIA certification that covers the tests they perform.
Any laboratory located in a state that has a CMS-approved laboratory program is exempt from CLIA certification. Currently, there are two states with approved programs: Washington and New York (partial exemption).
If CMS or the State Agency receives a complaint against a laboratory, the laboratory may receive an unannounced on site survey, even though it only perform waived tests or PPM procedures.
The following exceptions to CLIA certification apply regardless of a laboratory’s location:
- Any laboratory that only performs testing for forensic purposes
- Research laboratories that test human specimens but do not report patient-specific results for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or the assessment of the health of, individual patients
- Laboratories certified by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), in which drug testing is performed that meets SAMHSA guidelines and regulations. However, a CLIA certification is needed for all other testing conducted by a SAMHSA-certified laboratory.
Labs Should Prepare for Tighter CLIA Enforcement
By Robert Michel | From the Volume XV No. 4 – March 24, 2008 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: Lab directors and pathologists should take notice of disturbing new developments in enforcement of CLIA regulations. During the past year, CMS officials have revoked the CLIA certification of several hospital laboratories for what are, essentially, inadvertent violations of p…
Hospital Lab Takes CMS To Court in CLIA Case
By Robert Michel | From the Volume XV No. 4 – March 24, 2008 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: A California hospital challenged CMS in federal court over the threatened loss of its lab’s CLIA certificate. CMS threatened to revoke the certificate in 2007 and stop paying the hospital’s Medicare and Medi-Cal lab bills. In January, Victor Valley Community Hospital won …
Mobile Pathology Service Fuels Increased Revenue
By Robert Michel | From the Volume XIV No. 4 – March 12, 2007 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: When pathologist Raman Sukumar, M.D. founded a generalist pathology practice in 2003, he was convinced that local doctors would support his vision of pathology at the point of care. That vision was validated by rapid acceptance of his mobile pathology laboratory and a steady …
Pathologist Builds General Path Business From Office Lab
By Robert Michel | From the Volume XIII No. 16 – November 27, 2006 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: Doctors Pathology Services in Delaware is successful for two reasons. First it runs the largest pathology lab in the state. But more important, it runs one of the few successful mobile pathology services anywhere. The Mobile Intraoperative Consultation Service(MICS)allows the…
Urology Revenue Loss Drives AP Lab Condos
By Robert Michel | From the Volume XII No. 8 – May 30, 2005 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: Urologists are motivated to operate anatomic pathology laboratory condominiums as a way to replace lost income after Medicare imposed a major reimbursement cut for a key urology procedure. Capturing revenue from ancillary services is a hot topic within the urology profession….
Docs’ In-Office Testing Showing Mixed Trends
By Robert Michel | From the Volume IX No. 17 – December 9, 2002 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: Despite the burdens of CLIA certification and reduced reimbursement for lab tests, many medical practice experts are advising doctors to expand in-office testing. However, diagnostic technologies for near-patient testing are still not robust enough to support this trend. Earl…
Two New Public Labs Launch Operations in FL
By Robert Michel | From the Volume IX No. 10 – July 15, 2002 Issue
CEO SUMMARY: In 49 states, independent commercial laboratory companies are disappearing. But that’s not the case in Florida. In recent months, two new public laboratory companies completed organizational steps and now offer diagnostic testing services. Both companies are starting small,…
CURRENT ISSUE

Volume XXXII, No. 6 – April 21, 2025
Now that a federal judge has vacated the FDA’s LDT rule, The Dark Report analyzes the judgement and notes the various steps the FDA could take in response. Also, lab testing at pharmacies is proving to be less successful than was once anticipated.
See the full table of contentsHow Much Laboratory Business Intelligence Have You Missed?
Lab leaders rely on THE DARK REPORT for actionable intelligence on important developments in the business of laboratory testing. Maximize the money you make-and the money you keep! Best of all, it is released every three weeks!
Sign up for TDR Insider
Join the Dark Intelligence Group FREE and get TDR Insider FREE!
Never miss a single update on the issues that matter to you and your business.
Topics
- Anatomic Pathology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Clinical Laboratory
- Clinical Laboratory Trends
- Digital Pathology
- Genetic Testing
- In Vitro Diagnostics
- IVD/Lab Informatics
- Lab Intelligence
- Lab Marketplace
- Lab Risk & Compliance
- Laboratory Automation
- Laboratory Billing
- Laboratory Compliance
- Laboratory Equipment
- Laboratory Information Systems
- Laboratory Management
- Lean Six Sigma
- Managed Care Contracts
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Pathology Trends
- People
- Uncategorized